Skip to main content

"Rain Reign" by Ann M. Martin



I’m having a hard time reconciling my opposing viewpoints about Rain Reign by Ann Martin. It probably comes down to my dislike of books about problem kids. So, I’m predisposed to find something I don’t like. But it’s a good book with a strong plot and a likable narrator and I plan to share it with at least one of my book clubs. Well, I might. Maybe. In any event, it’ll probably be among the books talked about for the Newbery Award

Rose, our narrator, has been diagnosed with high-functioning autism, sometimes called Asperger’s Syndrome [total aside, my kid’s pediatrician believes that further research, especially in the area of genomic testing, will show that autism and Asperger’s are not on the same “spectrum,” but different syndromes with similarities]. She is obsessed with words that sound alike but mean different things, prime numbers, and following the rules. She is sensory-sensitive and often disruptive in class and at home, despite being very intelligent. 

So, here’s my first nit to pick. Rose tells us on the very first page that she knows words that sound alike but have different meanings are homophones, but she calls them homonyms throughout the novel. If Rose is so adamant about following rules (something that is shown over and over again) and loves homophones so much, why does she call them homonyms? [Another aside, homophones are a subset of homonyms.]

Second nit, in many of these problem kid books, there is a saintly person who understands the child better than most and does not ever lose patience with him or her. Filling the role here is her uncle Weldon. Rose’s father, a widower, though we don’t find that out until the end of the book, is running out of patience for his child and comes off as jerk. In fact, beyond Rose, there aren’t any well-developed characters.

Which may make sense … Rose is the narrator. Rose has Asperger’s. We only see the other characters from Rose’s perspective. BUT aren’t writers supposed to “show” and not “tell” anyway? Can’t their actions toward Rose be more nuanced? Maybe?

As I said, the plot and Rose are the strong selling points of this novel. You’ll read the book quickly – and not just because it’s short – but because every scene, every action makes sense and advances the story. You will care for Rose and root for her. And, like other novels of this ilk, maybe learn a little bit more about the problems some kids with these disorders face.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Harry vs. Septimus

Sometimes, I like the Septimus Heap series more than the Harry Potter series. There I said it. It’s a secret I’ve kept from all but my kids for a long time. Don’t get me wrong: I’m wild about Harry. I’ve knitted Harry Potter bookmarks (in Gryffindor colors, naturally). I’ve thrown at least two Harry Potter-themed birthday parties, complete with a sorting hat I made. I’ve stood at line overnight at Barnes and Noble waiting for the next book to come out three times. I read Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire  in one day. But, often, I like Angie Sage’s Septimus Heap books ( Magyk , Flyte , Physik , Queste , Syren , and the just published Darke ) more. And I’m not entirely sure why. My current theory is that the Septimus Heap books are better written and, while also highly derivative, much more charming. The characters are human (muggles, even) and fraught with faults. Also, the Harry Potter books are, rightly so, about Harry. Everything is from Harry’s perspective. Sadly, we don...
1 comment
Read more

“I Am Number Four,” by Pittacus Lore

I really wanted to read I Am Number Four by Pittacus Lore after I read a review of it a few months ago. I remember the reviewer saying that the author’s name is obviously a pseudonym, then just filed the title away. (I actually have a “book book” – a little book in which I write titles of books I want to read, organized by author. My kids tease me about my book book, but when you’re a motherboard with limited RAM, you need to write things down.) More recently I heard that it’s already been made into a “major motion picture” (due out in February!), so I knew I had to read it soon. And it was OK. The idea – aliens living among us, waiting to get strong enough to go back to rescue their home planet from horrible monsters who now might be coming to conquer Earth – was rather interesting. But the book was just OK. I liked it enough to keep reading it, but probably not enough to bother with the sequels. It’s certainly not as good as Suzanne Collins’ Hunger Games trilogy, which is also...
1 comment
Read more

"The Story of Arthur Truluv" by Elizabeth Berg

I have a confession to make: You know that book Wonder by R.J. Palacio about the boy with facial deformities who attends public school for the first time and it's difficult for everyone involved, but in the end everyone's heart grows at least four sizes and we all feel good? I didn't love it. It's OK. And the movie was probably OK too. But as far as plot, character development, the style of the writing... I thought it was just OK. That's how I feel about The Story of Arthur Truluv , which is really all the things the various blurbs about the book says it is -- heartwarming, moving and sweet. You may even cry a little. But, unfortunately, it's like a much-watered-down version of A Man Called Ove by Fredrik Backman. Which is a far better book.   Arthur is too good. And Maddy's story is somewhat unbelievable (Why is she bullied? How does she get into the situation she gets into?) and too cliche (goth teen going to art school?). Lucille...
Post a Comment
Read more