Skip to main content

"The Boy at the End of the World," by Greg van Eekhout

I’m very grateful for The Boy at the End of the World, by Greg Van Eekhout. It’s a good, though not outstanding, book. More important, it fills a gap: science fiction for 3rd-5th graders. Because at some point during the school year, a teacher will assign a science fiction book report and I will have a hard time recommending books.

I grew up reading science fiction and fantasy. And we know how much I like dystopian fiction (a lot). I have no problem finding good science fiction books for teens. In fact, some of the other librarians are tired of me telling teens (regardless of the assignment), “You must read Feed. Everyone should.” Or “You have to read Ender’s Game. You'll love it.” But younger kids come into the library looking for science fiction and it feels like there’s nothing very good. Most of them balk at the length of The True Meaning of Smekday (by Adam Rex), no matter how hard I sell it. They shrug their shoulders at The City of Ember (Jean DuPrau), even when I say it has a great ending. And look at me strangely when I say the Jon Scieszka’s Time Warp Trio series is science fiction because it involves time travel. Recently I gave a kid Dr. Proctor’s Fart Powder (Jo Nesbo), saying it’s science fiction because fart powder doesn’t exist. (He was insisting that Pokemon graphic novels would suffice as science fiction.) So, I’m really happy about The Boy at the End of the World.

In some far-out, wacky way, it reminds me of Cormac McCarthy’s The Road (without the cannibalism, if you will): The world has undergone some major destruction and few humans are left. In fact, for all we know, just one is left. Fisher, our boy, his robot Click, and a friendly mammoth he picks up along the way go in search of other humans. Their hope is that some other little pocket of humans has survived. They face just the right amount of challenges: They must find food and shelter for survival, outwit man- and mammoth-eating creatures, as well as wayward technology, and rely on each other for help. If only the speaking prairie dogs and the role they play in the climax didn’t call to mind Ewoks, I probably would have no misgivings at all about recommending this book. But thinking about it today, I’ve realized it’s ideal for that age group (and they might like the Ewokian prairie dogs). There are just the right about of worries about Fisher’s survival, and the kid is funny and resourceful. His robot sidekick isn’t very helpful, but everyone needs a sidekick. And the idea behind the book – mankind has virtually destroyed the world, but has preserved some things in the hope of repopulating the Earth with again with both humans and animals – makes for great science fiction.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Harry vs. Septimus

Sometimes, I like the Septimus Heap series more than the Harry Potter series. There I said it. It’s a secret I’ve kept from all but my kids for a long time. Don’t get me wrong: I’m wild about Harry. I’ve knitted Harry Potter bookmarks (in Gryffindor colors, naturally). I’ve thrown at least two Harry Potter-themed birthday parties, complete with a sorting hat I made. I’ve stood at line overnight at Barnes and Noble waiting for the next book to come out three times. I read Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire  in one day. But, often, I like Angie Sage’s Septimus Heap books ( Magyk , Flyte , Physik , Queste , Syren , and the just published Darke ) more. And I’m not entirely sure why. My current theory is that the Septimus Heap books are better written and, while also highly derivative, much more charming. The characters are human (muggles, even) and fraught with faults. Also, the Harry Potter books are, rightly so, about Harry. Everything is from Harry’s perspective. Sadly, we don...

The Little Things

I’m not perfect. I’m certainly not a perfectionist. I don’t even have any OCD tendencies (I’ve taken quizzes!). But, as a former copy editor, I do tend to correct mistakes (especially when watching television). It’s a habit. I bring this up because I’ve been bothered by things I’ve read in two books I recently had the opportunity to review. They’re somewhat little things, but I think someone should have checked on them. Like I said, I’m a former copy editor. It was part of my job to check things. But my personality is also such that I’m not always very assertive (luckily, I worked with very, very talented writers and editors who made my job easier). A story that still bothers me: My boss had written the phrase “a tough road to hoe” in one of his columns. I knew it was “row to hoe,” but I figured, he’s the boss, maybe he wants to use “road” because he was talking about paths we take. I wasn’t really brave enough to ask the boss if he knew he had gotten it wrong. Silly on my par...

“I Am Number Four,” by Pittacus Lore

I really wanted to read I Am Number Four by Pittacus Lore after I read a review of it a few months ago. I remember the reviewer saying that the author’s name is obviously a pseudonym, then just filed the title away. (I actually have a “book book” – a little book in which I write titles of books I want to read, organized by author. My kids tease me about my book book, but when you’re a motherboard with limited RAM, you need to write things down.) More recently I heard that it’s already been made into a “major motion picture” (due out in February!), so I knew I had to read it soon. And it was OK. The idea – aliens living among us, waiting to get strong enough to go back to rescue their home planet from horrible monsters who now might be coming to conquer Earth – was rather interesting. But the book was just OK. I liked it enough to keep reading it, but probably not enough to bother with the sequels. It’s certainly not as good as Suzanne Collins’ Hunger Games trilogy, which is also...